Justice Dept. Seeks to Halt Democrats’ Suit Over Trump’s Profits in Office

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Monday asked a federal appeals court to issue an emergency order halting a lawsuit by congressional Democrats that alleges that President Trump has illegally profited from his family business while in office.

In a court filing, the department’s lawyers asserted that Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia had committed a series of “clear and indisputable” legal errors in allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The most glaring of them, the department said, was his decision that members of Congress had legal standing to sue the president.

ImageThe department accused Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of committing a series of “clear and indisputable” legal errors in allowing the lawsuit to proceed.
CreditCharles Dharapak/Associated Press

Judge Sullivan, they argued in a filing to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, wrongly treated a complaint based on novel and flawed legal constitutional arguments as if it were “a run-of-the-mill commercial dispute.” If the appeals court refuses to intervene, they argued, the case will proceed into the evidence-gathering phase, in which Mr. Trump will be forced to reveal details of his financial affairs.

The department’s request to the appeals court came on the same day that the plaintiffs issued 37 subpoenas for information ranging from the Trump Organization’s corporate tax returns to information about the president’s financial trust.

The Democratic lawsuit alleges that the president has violated anti-corruption emolument clauses of the Constitution that restrict the ability of federal officials to reap financial benefits other than their salaries.

The Justice Department has also appealed another federal judge’s rulings in a similar lawsuit filed by the State of Maryland and the District of Columbia. A panel of judges with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia is now considering those arguments.

Source: NYT

Please follow and like us:
error